"Let's get the city we all want, then maybe we
can do a more significant reduction....." 6/10/06
in St. Petersburg Times.
Rick Kriseman
referring to his opposition to even a token cut in Property Taxes for 2007 in St. Petersburg. Kriseman actually
opposed even Token Tax Cuts in 2003, voted for higher taxes in 2007, and has voted every year to allow property taxes
to nearly double in St. Petersburg since 2000. Rick Kriseman constantly favors higher taxes! Follow link
below to learn more.
Facts:
Rick
Kriseman has voted to raise tax collections every year since he was appointed to the council in 2000.
In
2003, Only Mr. Kriseman opposed even a TOKEN Tax Cut!
0n 9/14/06, Rick Kriseman Cast a Tie Breaking
vote to increase St. Petersburg Tax Collections to highest level ever: $103.4 Million.
With Kriseman’s eager support, Property Tax Collections
have nearly Doubled in St.Petersburg from $52.3 Million in 1999 to $103.4
Million for 2007 – the HIGHEST IN CITY HISTORY!!!
Rick
Kriseman thinks it is “Unfair” that some people still have lower taxes with the Save Our Homes Tax Cap passed
by voters in 1992.
Mr. Kriseman would like everyone to pay
higher taxes rather than lowering the taxes of those who lose the Save Our Home Exemption when they move or buy a house after
taxes are already high.
Mr. Kriseman insists on using the “happy talk” that tax
“rates” are the lowest in 20 years! But Tax COLLECTIONS – from your pocket – are still skyrocketing
in St. Petersburg.
Don’t be fooled by his “Happy Talk” of the “lowest tax rate”. TAX COLLECTIONS
KEEP GOING UP!
Rick
Kriseman should know that run-away taxes hurt first time home buyers, renters, long time homeowners trapped in their houses
and small businesses!

In the story, Kriseman indicates that any tax rate cut should wait
until we spend more on “city services”. Here is the excerpt:
'City
Council member Rick Kriseman said the savings from such a tax cut might be better spent on enhanced city services. He's
fearful, however, that any attempt to keep the money in the city budget could be interpreted as a tax increase."Let's make sure we can pay for what we got and what the people expect,"
Kriseman said. "Let's get the city we all want, then maybe we can do a more significant reduction, one that has a
real impact."'
So apparently
Mr. Kriseman’s solution is to keep taxes as high as possible until some undefined time in the future when we “get
the city we all want” and then consider some cuts. This is the same man who was the ONLY one to vote
against even the token tax cut in 2003 saying it would be fiscally irresponsible to do so. Cut Taxes Now thinks we
already have the city we want. What more is there for the Government to buy? Of
course, they will be the only ones who can afford to buy anything at the current rate!